Skip to main content

Continue Reading

Next Chapter →
Chapter 16 of 25

APRAADHI

Chapter 16: Nishita

2,476 words | 10 min read

# Chapter 16: Nishita

## The Ally

Aarav came on the second Saturday.

I had not seen him in three weeks — three weeks during which the only communication had been through my mother's notes, the tiny squares of paper under the poha, the coded references to a boy who was "fine" and who "missed me" and whose existence outside the compound wall was both a comfort and a torment, the way a window is both a comfort and a torment to a person who cannot leave the room.

He arrived with Carmela. My mother had arranged it — the visiting hours allowed two visitors per session, and Aai had used her slot to send the people she knew I needed most: the boy and the best friend, the two pillars of the life that the Centre had interrupted.

Aarav walked into the visiting room and I saw what three weeks had done to him. He was thinner — the angular build that I had found attractive was now sharp, the bones more visible, the face leaner, the jaw that I had kissed on a plateau under stars now carrying the gauntness of a boy who was not eating well because the girl he loved was behind a wall. His eyes were the same — dark, warm, the eyes that had looked at me on the first day at the vada pav cart and had seen, in the transfer girl from Mumbai, something worth waking up at 6:47 AM for.

He sat across from me. Sunanda was at her desk, register open, ears functioning. Carmela sat next to him, her presence both emotional support and strategic — two visitors meant two conversations, and two conversations meant that Sunanda's attention was divided, the surveillance diluted by the mathematics of human attention.

"Hey," he said.

"Hey."

The word carried everything. The three weeks. The separation. The plateau. The kiss. The Bolero. The handcuffs. The grey salwar kameez and the boundary wall and the concertina wire and the specific, annihilating distance between a boy in a chair and a girl in a compound.

"How's school?" I asked. Surface layer. Register-appropriate.

"Mrs. Ghoshal asked about you. She said your integration work was the best in the class. She's saving your assignments."

"Tell her I'll be back."

"I tell her every day."

Carmela leaned in. "Nikhil did his Shahrukh Khan impression at the inter-house competition. He won. The judges were crying. I don't know if they were crying from laughter or from the accuracy, but either way, he won."

The normalcy was painful and necessary — the details of a life that was continuing without me, the school and the vada pav and the cricket and the Shahrukh Khan impressions, the life that was waiting for me on the other side of the wall.

"Dhondu asks about you," Aarav said. "He saves a vada pav every afternoon. Keeps it under the counter. When you don't come, he gives it to Tejas, and Tejas eats it with the guilt of a man eating a sacred offering."

I laughed. The sound surprised me — the laugh that I had not heard from my own mouth in three weeks, the sound that had been buried under the schedule and the therapy and the grey salwar kameez and the lock on the outside of the door. The laugh emerged like an animal from a burrow — cautious, blinking, not sure whether the surface was safe.

Sunanda looked up. The laugh registered — a patient laughing during a visit was a data point, filed under "emotional response" in the register, the register that would be reviewed by Dr. Kamble as part of the weekly assessment.

Let her file it. A girl laughing with her friends was not pathology. A girl laughing despite everything was not a symptom. A girl laughing was proof of life.

Carmela began talking — the stream-of-consciousness update that she delivered with the Volume and pace of a Goan wedding toast, the content a mixture of school gossip, weather reports, political commentary (the Panchgani municipal elections were approaching, and Carmela had opinions), and food reviews (Ganpat's chai stall had introduced a new flavour — tulsi and jaggery, which Carmela described as "like drinking a grandmother's blessing, but hot"). The torrent of words served a dual purpose: it was genuine friendship, and it was cover. While Carmela talked, Sunanda's attention was on Carmela — the volume demanded attention the way a siren demanded attention, not by choice but by physics.

Under the table, Aarav's hand found mine.

And under the table, my hand passed him a folded square of paper.

The paper had been prepared the night before — the evidence from the third building transcribed onto the smallest possible format, the billing figures, the drug names, the patient list, the description of the restraint beds, all written in a handwriting that was smaller than my normal handwriting and that my mother would need reading glasses to decipher, which was fine because my mother wore reading glasses and because the information's illegibility to casual observers was a feature, not a bug.

Aarav's hand closed around the paper. The transfer was invisible — accomplished under the table, under Carmela's verbal cover, under Sunanda's divided attention, the exchange lasting less than two seconds and carrying enough evidence to dismantle the Sahyadri Centre.

"I have to use the bathroom," Aarav said. He stood. The paper was in his pocket — transferred from hand to pocket during the standing motion, the sleight-of-hand of a boy who played cricket and who understood that the hand's speed could exceed the eye's tracking, that the ball could be caught before the batsman saw the hand move.

He went to the bathroom. The bathroom was down the hall — the visitors' bathroom, not the patients' bathroom, a distinction that the Centre maintained because even institutions that confined children observed the social niceties of plumbing. In the bathroom, the paper would be transferred from his pocket to his shoe — inside the shoe, under the insole, the hiding place that Aarav had devised because he had anticipated the possibility that visitors would be searched on exit and because shoes were the last place that a cursory search would check.

He returned. Sat down. Carmela was still talking — she had moved from the municipal elections to the monsoon's impact on the strawberry crop ("Patil says it's the worst season in seven years, the berries are waterlogged, the Mahabaleshwar farmers are talking about switching to flowers") — and the room's atmosphere was that of a normal visit, a normal conversation, a girl in a facility being visited by friends who brought news and normalcy and the specific gift of human connection.

"Nishi," Aarav said. Quietly. Under Carmela's ongoing review of the agricultural situation. "I'm going to get you out of here."

"The appeal—"

"Not the appeal. If the appeal takes too long. If the system doesn't work. I'll get you out."

"Aaru. Don't do anything stupid."

"I won't do anything stupid. I'll do something necessary."

The distinction was the distinction of a boy who had spent three weeks processing his powerlessness and who had decided that powerlessness was not a permanent condition but a temporary one, the way a bowler's bad form was temporary — correctable through practice, through analysis, through the specific application of will to circumstance.

"Trust me," he said.

I trusted him. Not because the trust was rational — trusting a seventeen-year-old boy to extract a person from a secured facility was not rational by any definition — but because trust was the currency of the relationship, the thing that we had been building since the first vada pav and the first almost-smile and the first kiss on the basalt boulder, and the currency was not devalued by the circumstances. If anything, the circumstances had inflated it. Trust in comfort is easy. Trust in crisis is the real thing.

The visit ended at noon. Sunanda closed the register. The visitors stood. The ritual of departure — the embrace that was allowed (one hug, supervised, the duration noted), the words that were allowed ("I'll see you next week," "take care," "eat properly"), and the words that were not allowed but that were communicated through the squeeze of hands and the pressure of the embrace and the look that passed between two people who were saying goodbye and who were both pretending that goodbye was temporary.

Aarav squeezed my hand. Three times.

Yes. I have the paper.

I watched them leave. Through the visiting room window, I saw them cross the courtyard — Aarav and Carmela, walking toward the gate, the guard checking their visitor passes with the bureaucratic thoroughness of a man who took his clipboard seriously. They passed. They left. The gate closed behind them.

In Aarav's shoe, under the insole, the evidence sat — the billing figures and the drug names and the patient list and the description of the restraint beds, the information that would travel from the shoe to my mother's hands to Sushma-mavshi's file to the Bombay High Court, the information that would crack the foundation of the Kamble sisters' operation.


That evening, during free time, Gauri sat next to me in the common room. The television was on — a Marathi serial that the patients watched with the passive attention of people who had nothing else to watch, the serial's melodrama a distant cousin of the real drama that was unfolding in the compound and that the serial's writers could not have imagined.

"Did you get it out?" Gauri whispered.

"Yes."

"All of it?"

"Enough. The billing figures. The drugs. The patient list. Six names."

"Six out of twenty-four."

"It's a start. The lawyer only needs a pattern. Six is a pattern."

Gauri was quiet. On the television, a woman in a silk saree was confronting her husband about his infidelity — the standard Marathi serial plot, the domestic betrayal that audiences consumed as entertainment and that my family was living as reality, the fiction and the truth overlapping in the way that fiction and truth always overlapped in India, where the serials were not fantasy but documentary.

"My mother hasn't visited," Gauri said. "Since I was admitted. Five months. Not once."

The sentence was flat. Delivered without self-pity, without drama, with the particular economy of a girl who had processed an absence and who was stating it as fact rather than complaint.

"Gauri—"

"She can't afford the bus. Satara to Panchgani. The ticket is ₹120. Round trip, ₹240. She earns ₹8,000 a month. Rent is ₹4,000. Food for my two brothers is ₹2,500. School fees are ₹500. That leaves ₹1,000 for everything else — electricity, water, clothes, medical. A bus ticket to see me is a quarter of the everything-else. She can't spend it."

The arithmetic was the specific arithmetic of poverty — the mathematics that reduced human connection to a budget line, the mathematics that the Centre's billing system exploited, because the Centre's patients were disproportionately drawn from families that could not afford lawyers or bus tickets or the luxury of fighting back.

"When I get out," I said, "you're getting out too."

"Nishi—"

"I mean it. The PIL — the Public Interest Litigation — isn't just about me. It's about all of you. Twenty-four patients. Twenty-four families. The lawyer is building a case for all of you."

Gauri looked at me. The look was the look of a girl who wanted to believe and who had been in this place long enough to know that wanting to believe was the first stage of disappointment, that hope in a compound with locks on the outside of the doors was the cruelest thing you could carry.

"I believe you," she said. "Not because I think you can do it. Because I think your mother can."

The assessment was accurate. My mother — the schoolteacher, the woman with the notebook, the woman who ironed her nightgowns and made poha with the perfect turmeric-to-peanut ratio and who had, in the six weeks since my arrest, assembled more evidence against the Kamble sisters than the entire district administration had assembled in three years — was the person to believe in. Not me. I was the girl in the compound. My mother was the force outside it.

The serial ended. The television was turned off. The patients moved to their rooms. The schedule's final transition — free time to lights-out, the last gap of autonomy before the doors were locked and the night staff began their rounds and the compound settled into the particular silence of a place where twenty-four people lay in beds they had not chosen in rooms they could not leave.

Room 4. Bed 2. The boundary wall outside the window. The wire. The sky.

Gauri in Bed 3, her breathing evening out as sleep arrived — the sleep that came late and left early, the sleep of a girl whose mother could not afford a bus ticket.

I lay in the dark and thought about Aarav. Walking through Panchgani with the evidence in his shoe. Carrying the paper to my mother. The paper that would become a file that would become a case that would become a hearing in the Bombay High Court.

The system was large. The system was institutional. The system had police and courts and funding and the specific weight of authority that institutions carried in India, where the state's power was not abstract but physical — present in the uniform, the stamp, the file, the lock.

But the system was also brittle. Brittle because it depended on silence, and the silence was breaking. Brittle because it depended on isolation, and the isolation was breached. Brittle because it depended on the assumption that its victims were alone, and its victims were not alone.

I had my mother. I had my lawyer. I had Aarav. I had Carmela. I had Gauri and Mehak and Rohit and Tanvi and Akash and Snehal — twenty-four people who were not patients but prisoners, and whose stories were evidence, and whose evidence was now, thanks to a boy's shoe and a mother's poha and a girl's midnight trips to a building that she had been told not to enter, on its way to the court.

The system was large. But the fight was larger.

The monsoon rain began again. The tin roof played its nightly concert. And somewhere in Panchgani, in a cottage on the Mahabaleshwar Road, my mother was reading the paper that Aarav had delivered, her reading glasses on, her notebook open, her pen moving, the evidence accumulating with the patience and precision of a woman who understood that the first step in changing a system was documenting it, and the second step was refusing to stop.

She would not stop.

Neither would I.

© 2025 Atharva Inamdar. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Free to read and share with attribution.